• Home
  • Podcast
  • Contact
Ervik.as
Cloud, Cyber Security, EUC, DaaS and HCI
  • Cloud
    • Azure
    • Citrix Cloud
    • Cloud Management
    • Nutanix Clusters
  • Cyber Security
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Cyber Security News
  • EUC
    • Citrix
      • Citrix Analytics
      • Citrix NetScaler
      • Citrix Provisioning
      • Receiver
      • ShareFile
      • Citrix Virtual Apps (XenApp)
      • Citrix Virtual Desktops (XenDesktop)
      • Workspace
      • Workspace app
    • DaaS
      • Azure Virtual Desktop
      • Frame
    • Microsoft
      • HoloLens
      • Microsoft App-V
      • Remote Desktop Services
      • Windows 7
      • Windows 8
      • Windows 10
      • Windows Server 2008
      • Windows Server 2008 R2
      • Windows Server 2012
      • Windows Server 2012 R2
      • Windows Server 2016
    • Thin Clients
      • Igel
      • Wyse
    • VMware
      • Fusion
      • Horizon View
      • Vmware ThinApp
      • Vmware Workstation
    • Parallels
      • Remote Application Server
  • End User Experience
    • ControlUp
    • eG Innovations
    • Goliath Technologies
    • Liquidware
  • Datacenter
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
      • Altaro
      • HYCU
      • Unitrends
      • Rubrik
      • Veeam Software
    • Containers
      • Docker
      • Red Hat OpenShift
    • Hybrid Multi Cloud
      • Nutanix
        • Nutanix Database Service
        • Files
        • Flow
        • Nutanix AHV
        • Nutanix Cloud Platform
    • Server Virtualization
      • Nutanix AHV
      • Microsoft Hyper-V
      • VMware vSphere
      • Citrix Hypervisor (XenServer)
    • Network & Security
      • Nutanix Flow
      • Palo Alto Networks
  • About
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    • News
      • Citrix Community News
nutanix-logo-transparent

Nutanix

New Taneja Group TCO study reveals Nutanix Hyper-Converged infrastructure provides 55% lower OPEX

Alexander Ervik Johnsen Converged, hyperconverged, Nutanix 2015-01-05

With the recent news around EMC acquiring VCE, Nutanix found themselves on the receiving end of a great deal of questions from industry experts, press and media and end-users, who want to know more about the difference in the technology from Nutanix and VCE.

The Taneja Group, an industry analyst firm, recently conducted a field report customers about the real world performance of converged vs. Web-scale converged infrastructure solutions.

Converged and hyperconverged systems seek to simplify this complexity. Both types integrate the hypervisor, physical servers, network, and storage into a single simplified infrastructure. The hoped-for results are lower infrastructure cost, faster business computing and lower overhead for IT administrators.

Taneja interviewed a random sample of customers of each vendor and here are some of their conclusions:

Acquisition Costs

  • VCE’s Vblock costs are higher for purchasing rack(s) of equipment. Installation and training comes as extra costs.
  • Nutanix offers lower acquisition prices through hyperconverged web-scale architecture at affordable flexible increments.

OPEX

  • VCE support costs are higher, and upgrades are complex and require specialized VCE engineers to perform. Large equipment takes additional space and costs a considerable amount in power and cooling.
  • Nutanix support costs are minimal compared to VCE because of the ease of deployment, provisioning, and upgrading. And its compact form factor size saves a tremendous amount of rack-space and power and cooling costs.

Ease of Management

  • VBlock – Different customers used different management approaches based on previous backgrounds.
  • Administrative tasks are VM centric with no specific knowledge needed for servers, networking, or storage management.

Time to Value

  • A Nutanix installation requires a one to two week design phase, two weeks for order to delivery and one day to deploy.
  • VCE has a two to three month design phase, 45 day factory configuration and one week deployment.

The report indicates the same conclusions kept emerging: VCE users see convergence as a benefit over traditional do-it-yourself infrastructure, but an expensive one. The Nutanix users also shared valuable hyperconvergence benefits. In contrast to VCE, they also cited simplified architecture and management, far more reasonable acquisition and operating costs, and considerably faster time to value.

You can access the full Taneja Group report here.

 

SOURCE

Related Posts

Nutanix /

Nutanix and NVIDIA Collaborate to Accelerate Enterprise AI Adoption

Nutanix /

Cisco Discontinues HyperFlex for Nutanix with new Strategic Relationship

Nutanix /

Nutanix is announcing their GPT-in-a-Box solution

Nutanix /

Nutanix sells off their DaaS solution Frame

Nutanix /

Nutanix Announces Nutanix Central, Cloud to Edge Management Solution

‹ Receiver for HTML5 1.5 released› Nutanix Enables Taiwan’s Chun Yuan Steel Group to Accelerate and Revolutionize its Virtual Desktop Environment

Back to Top

Crafted in the land of the Vikings 🇳🇴 by Alexander Ervik Johnsen.
Copyright 2000-2025 - www.ervik.as - All Rights Reserved