• Home
  • Podcast
  • Contact
Ervik.as
Cloud, Cyber Security, EUC, DaaS and HCI
  • Cloud
    • Azure
    • Citrix Cloud
    • Cloud Management
    • Nutanix Clusters
  • Cyber Security
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Cyber Security News
  • EUC
    • Citrix
      • Citrix Analytics
      • Citrix NetScaler
      • Citrix Provisioning
      • Receiver
      • ShareFile
      • Citrix Virtual Apps (XenApp)
      • Citrix Virtual Desktops (XenDesktop)
      • Workspace
      • Workspace app
    • DaaS
      • Azure Virtual Desktop
      • Frame
    • Microsoft
      • HoloLens
      • Microsoft App-V
      • Remote Desktop Services
      • Windows 7
      • Windows 8
      • Windows 10
      • Windows Server 2008
      • Windows Server 2008 R2
      • Windows Server 2012
      • Windows Server 2012 R2
      • Windows Server 2016
    • Thin Clients
      • Igel
      • Wyse
    • VMware
      • Fusion
      • Horizon View
      • Vmware ThinApp
      • Vmware Workstation
    • Parallels
      • Remote Application Server
  • End User Experience
    • ControlUp
    • eG Innovations
    • Goliath Technologies
    • Liquidware
  • Datacenter
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
      • Altaro
      • HYCU
      • Unitrends
      • Rubrik
      • Veeam Software
    • Containers
      • Docker
      • Red Hat OpenShift
    • Hybrid Multi Cloud
      • Nutanix
        • Nutanix Database Service
        • Files
        • Flow
        • Nutanix AHV
        • Nutanix Cloud Platform
    • Server Virtualization
      • Nutanix AHV
      • Microsoft Hyper-V
      • VMware vSphere
      • Citrix Hypervisor (XenServer)
    • Network & Security
      • Nutanix Flow
      • Palo Alto Networks
  • About
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    • News
      • Citrix Community News
XenDesktop

XenDesktop

Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 vs VMware View 5 Report

Alexander Ervik Johnsen Citrix, Citrix XenDesktop 5.x, Desktop Virtualization, VDI, VDI Bandwith, VMware, VMware View 5.x, WAN, XenDesktop vs View 2012-07-03

A couple of months back, VMware published a report not approved by Citrix on performance tests they commissioned that evaluated a single user using single virtual desktop on a “quiet” LAN to support their claims that PCOIP provided equal or better performance than HDX.  What experienced IT professional is going to test a single user environment and extrapolate that to expected performance with hundreds or thousands of people in departments or divisions?  Certainly not any IT pros we work with.  Maybe that single user test is important for the typical View deployments?  But seriously, the report does not simulate any production environment and has little value in real world deployments.  Also, in the same report the “Best” performance is in the multi-media redirection scenario (which our customers use in real world) – and is won by XenDesktop but VMware simply tries to discount this very relevant use case.

Read more of Vishal Ganeriwala ‘s blog here

XenDesktop

 

Download the report here

 

{loadposition content_starwind600}

Related Posts

XenDesktop /

Citrix positioned as a Leader in the 2019-2020 IDC MarketScape for VCC

XenDesktop /

How to Anticipate Citrix End-User Performance Issues with Embedded Intelligence and Automation

XenDesktop /

Citrix Optimizer 2.0.0.109

XenDesktop /

Citrix Receiver 4.x vs Citrix Workspace app 1808

XenDesktop /

How eG Enterprise ensures a samless upgrade to Citrix XenApp & XenDesktop 7.x

‹ VMware acquires DynamicOps and extends cloud solutions› Citrix AppDNA – quick overview demo

Back to Top

Crafted in the land of the Vikings 🇳🇴 by Alexander Ervik Johnsen.
Copyright 2000-2025 - www.ervik.as - All Rights Reserved