• Home
  • Podcast
  • Contact
Ervik.as
Cloud, Cyber Security, EUC, DaaS and HCI
  • Cloud
    • Azure
    • Citrix Cloud
    • Cloud Management
    • Nutanix Clusters
  • Cyber Security
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Cyber Security News
  • EUC
    • Citrix
      • Citrix Analytics
      • Citrix NetScaler
      • Citrix Provisioning
      • Receiver
      • ShareFile
      • Citrix Virtual Apps (XenApp)
      • Citrix Virtual Desktops (XenDesktop)
      • Workspace
      • Workspace app
    • DaaS
      • Azure Virtual Desktop
      • Frame
    • Microsoft
      • HoloLens
      • Microsoft App-V
      • Remote Desktop Services
      • Windows 7
      • Windows 8
      • Windows 10
      • Windows Server 2008
      • Windows Server 2008 R2
      • Windows Server 2012
      • Windows Server 2012 R2
      • Windows Server 2016
    • Thin Clients
      • Igel
      • Wyse
    • VMware
      • Fusion
      • Horizon View
      • Vmware ThinApp
      • Vmware Workstation
    • Parallels
      • Remote Application Server
  • End User Experience
    • ControlUp
    • eG Innovations
    • Goliath Technologies
    • Liquidware
  • Datacenter
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
      • Altaro
      • HYCU
      • Unitrends
      • Rubrik
      • Veeam Software
    • Containers
      • Docker
      • Red Hat OpenShift
    • Hybrid Multi Cloud
      • Nutanix
        • Nutanix Database Service
        • Files
        • Flow
        • Nutanix AHV
        • Nutanix Cloud Platform
    • Server Virtualization
      • Nutanix AHV
      • Microsoft Hyper-V
      • VMware vSphere
      • Citrix Hypervisor (XenServer)
    • Network & Security
      • Nutanix Flow
      • Palo Alto Networks
  • About
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    • News
      • Citrix Community News

XenDesktop

Citrix XenDesktop Sites – Scale Up or Out

Alexander Ervik Johnsen Citrix, Hyper-V, VDI, Virtual Desktop, vSphere, Windows 7 virtual machine, Windows 7 VM, XenDesktop, XenServer 2012-02-24

How many desktops can a XenDesktop 5.x site support?  Tests have been done showing that a site can support 10,000, 20,000 or more desktops. But my question is if it really matters. After a certain number, Citrix always am left to wonder if putting that many desktops in a single site is really a good idea. It all comes down to what level of risk you are willing to take. Let me go through what Daniel Feller means:

  • Host Risk: At the base level, we have a hypervisor host (XenServer, Hyper-V or vSphere). Depending on the hardware and user workload, I’ll be running somewhere between 50-100 virtual Windows 7 desktops on each host. If the host has a catastrophic failure, those desktops go offline. Users will try to reconnect and they will be sent to other hosts. This is why we recommend N+1 at a minimum. If you lose one host, you should have at least one extra one to take over. If you lose a host, you can expect most of those users to try to reconnect immediately. Trying to support 50-100 connections is easy.
  • Pool/Cluster Risk: One level higher than the host is a group of hosts in a pool or cluster. You will probably have around 800 desktops in a pool/cluster if we assume you have 10 hosts in a cluster. What happens if we lose the cluster? Depending on the type of failure, you will have one of the following:
    • Connection Failure: If you have a failure where the pool/cluster controller fails, you won’t be able to launch new desktops, but currently active users will be unaware of any issues.
    • Pool/Cluster Failure: If you lose an entire pool/cluster, you have to find a place for those 800 desktop users. Again, if you have N+1 fault tolerance, you probably have spare capacity within your entire environment. You also need to make sure your infrastructure can support 800 users trying to connect simultaneously. This still isn’t that big of a connection storm.

 

Click here to read the full blog post on Citrix.com

 

{loadposition content_starwind600}

Related Posts

XenDesktop /

Citrix positioned as a Leader in the 2019-2020 IDC MarketScape for VCC

XenDesktop /

How to Anticipate Citrix End-User Performance Issues with Embedded Intelligence and Automation

XenDesktop /

Citrix Optimizer 2.0.0.109

XenDesktop /

Citrix Receiver 4.x vs Citrix Workspace app 1808

XenDesktop /

How eG Enterprise ensures a samless upgrade to Citrix XenApp & XenDesktop 7.x

‹ IGEL is improving thin client performance with Citrix XenDesktop, XenApp, VMware View 5 and Microsoft VDI› Citrix on Innovation and the Future of Cloud Platforms

Back to Top

Crafted in the land of the Vikings 🇳🇴 by Alexander Ervik Johnsen.
Copyright 2000-2025 - www.ervik.as - All Rights Reserved