• Home
  • Podcast
  • Contact
Ervik.as
Cloud, Cyber Security, EUC, DaaS and HCI
  • Cloud
    • Azure
    • Citrix Cloud
    • Cloud Management
    • Nutanix Clusters
  • Cyber Security
    • Arctic Wolf
    • Cyber Security News
  • EUC
    • Citrix
      • Citrix Analytics
      • Citrix NetScaler
      • Citrix Provisioning
      • Receiver
      • ShareFile
      • Citrix Virtual Apps (XenApp)
      • Citrix Virtual Desktops (XenDesktop)
      • Workspace
      • Workspace app
    • DaaS
      • Azure Virtual Desktop
      • Frame
    • Microsoft
      • HoloLens
      • Microsoft App-V
      • Remote Desktop Services
      • Windows 7
      • Windows 8
      • Windows 10
      • Windows Server 2008
      • Windows Server 2008 R2
      • Windows Server 2012
      • Windows Server 2012 R2
      • Windows Server 2016
    • Thin Clients
      • Igel
      • Wyse
    • VMware
      • Fusion
      • Horizon View
      • Vmware ThinApp
      • Vmware Workstation
    • Parallels
      • Remote Application Server
  • End User Experience
    • ControlUp
    • eG Innovations
    • Goliath Technologies
    • Liquidware
  • Datacenter
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
      • Altaro
      • HYCU
      • Unitrends
      • Rubrik
      • Veeam Software
    • Containers
      • Docker
      • Red Hat OpenShift
    • Hybrid Multi Cloud
      • Nutanix
        • Nutanix Database Service
        • Files
        • Flow
        • Nutanix AHV
        • Nutanix Cloud Platform
    • Server Virtualization
      • Nutanix AHV
      • Microsoft Hyper-V
      • VMware vSphere
      • Citrix Hypervisor (XenServer)
    • Network & Security
      • Nutanix Flow
      • Palo Alto Networks
  • About
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    • News
      • Citrix Community News

Goliath Technologies/ Citrix/ XenApp/ XenDesktop

ICA Latency Isn’t Enough Troubleshooting End User Experience

Alexander Ervik Johnsen Citrix, Goliath Technologies, XenApp, XenDesktop 2018-03-14

ICA Latency Isn’t Enough: Troubleshooting End User Experience with Advanced Citrix ICA/HDX Metrics and Analysis

“Citrix is slow” is one of the most common end user complains that frustrates both the end users themselves and the support teams and administrators tasked with resolving the issue.  The challenge is finding the key metrics that identify the true root-cause of the problem so that Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop administrators can proactively monitor, troubleshoot and prevent end user experience issues quickly and confidently.

The ICA/HDX remoting protocol delivers critical applications and resources to users across geographic distances and various connection mediums on different devices.  This means the network layer is enormously responsible for delivering a good end user experience.  For this reason, many people and monitoring solutions use ICA Latency as their end-all measure for understanding end user experience issues over Citrix ICA/HDX.  It’s a convenient and broadly available, but to truly understand what specific factors are contributing to the problem, you need a tool that breaks down ICA Latency into its detailed components.

ICA Latency Isn’t Enough: Troubleshooting End User Experience with Advanced Citrix ICA/HDX Metrics and Analysis

ICA Latency is the time from when a user executes a keystroke or mouse click to when it is processed on the session host.  It includes both network latency and any delay on the session host to process this request.  To best understand the cause of end user issues, administrators require an application that can break out and track these sub-components separately to identify and address the true root-cause.

ICA Round Trip Time (RTT) is the elapsed time from when the user hits a key until the response is displayed back at the end point, as calculated by the session experience monitoring service. The difference between the ICA Latency and RTT is the application processing time on the session host.

ICA Network Latency is the amount of time it takes data to reach the server.  ICA Network Latency may be higher than ICA Latency, as underlying Citrix protocols are designed to will smooth out ICA Latency spikes to improve experience for the end user.  The delta between ICA Network Latency and ICA Latency can be attributed to server performance.

By breaking ICA Latency into ICA RTT and ICA Network Latency, IT Administrators can take the general complaint ‘Citrix is slow’ and quickly identify specific reasons driving that issue – be that bandwidth, server performance, or application performance issues.  Using this information and more detailed metrics available from Goliath Performance Monitor, administrators can confidently take specific action to remediate problems with the network, or with resource issues at the server.

For more information on how to confidently troubleshoot end user experience issues using Citrix ICA/HDX please download our whitepaper:  The Citrix Administrator’s Guide to Citrix ICA/HDX

Related Posts

Goliath Technologies /

Goliath Technologies is Revolutionizing Clinician End User Experience Troubleshooting with Industry Only Epic Integration

Citrix /

Citrix announces acquisition of Unicon

XenApp /

Citrix HDX for Dummies Free eBook version 2.5

XenDesktop /

Citrix positioned as a Leader in the 2019-2020 IDC MarketScape for VCC

Goliath Technologies /

Goliath Technologies Unveils AI-Powered Monitoring and Troubleshooting Assistant – KIP

‹ Nutanix acquires Netsil› Spice Money Transforms Digital Payments with Nutanix Enterprise Cloud OS

Back to Top

Crafted in the land of the Vikings 🇳🇴 by Alexander Ervik Johnsen.
Copyright 2000-2025 - www.ervik.as - All Rights Reserved